bolder logo black

Save your dopamine

Why Visual Identity Is Especially Difficult in Biotech
Why Visual Identity Is Especially Difficult in Biotech
Why Visual Identity Is Especially Difficult in Biotech

How to Run a Brand Sprint: The 5-Day Process to Define Your Positioning

What Is a Brand Sprint (and Why Most Brands Skip It)

A Brand Sprint is a structured workshop designed to help leadership teams define brand positioning, audience priorities, values, personality, and strategic direction in a compressed timeframe.

The framework was popularized by Google Ventures through the work of Jake Knapp and his colleagues. The original GV Brand Sprint is not a months-long consulting engagement. It is a three hour workshop consisting of six exercises that help teams move from abstract opinions to concrete decisions about brand identity and positioning.

The appeal is obvious. Many businesses spend months debating what their company stands for without reaching alignment. A Brand Sprint creates a common language for future decisions and transforms vague discussions into actionable outputs.

Despite this, most brands skip the process entirely.

Some founders believe brand strategy can wait until after growth. Others jump directly into visual identity development, website redesign, or messaging. Many companies start discussing logos before agreeing on who they serve or why they exist.

This often creates expensive downstream problems. Without alignment on positioning, every subsequent decision becomes harder. Decisions about visuals, voice, messaging, hiring, partnerships, and even product direction become subjective debates.

A Brand Sprint solves this by forcing alignment early.

The workshop helps teams:

  • Define brand values

  • Clarify target audience priorities

  • Establish positioning

  • Identify differentiation opportunities

  • Create decision making principles

  • Develop a simple brand cheat sheet

While the original GV Brand Sprint takes roughly three hours, many companies now use an expanded 5-day Brand Sprint process that allows more time for research, discussion, validation, and refinement.

The original article describes the three hour brand sprint as a sprint like process designed to help company executives transform the idea of our brand into something concrete. Instead of relying on subsequent squishy decisions about visuals voice and identity, teams establish decision making principles that guide future work. The Brand Sprint consists of six exercises and produces a simple cheat sheet that helps new employees, potential hires, agency partners, and even company executives make more consistent decisions.

The 5-Day Brand Sprint Process: Day-by-Day Breakdown

The 5-day Brand Sprint expands on the original GV Brand Sprint framework while preserving its core goal: helping teams define brand positioning quickly and collaboratively.

Day

Focus Area

Key Output

Day 1

Brand Foundations

Values shortlist, mission, purpose

Day 2

Audience Understanding

Prioritized audiences and buyer insights

Day 3

Competitive Positioning

Differentiation framework

Day 4

Messaging & Narrative

Positioning statement and messaging

Day 5

Validation & Alignment

Brand cheat sheet and final decisions

Day 1: Brand Foundations

The first day focuses on defining what the company stands for.

Most Brand Sprint exercises begin with versions of the 20-Year Roadmap exercise. Teams imagine where the company could be decades into the future and work backward to identify what matters most.

Another core exercise is the What, How, Why framework, inspired by ideas popularized through Simon Sinek's work. The goal is to clarify not only what the company does, but why it exists.

Teams then identify core values.

One of the most important lessons from successful Brand Sprints is that companies should prioritize three core values rather than producing long lists. Values only guide decision making when tradeoffs exist.

One of the most useful aspects of the workshop is forcing prioritization. Teams may start with dozens of company values, but the goal is to narrow them down to three values and eventually identify a single most important value. When people disagree, the Decider chooses. This prevents endless debates and ensures that even company policy, hiring decisions, and future product choices can be evaluated against a shared set of principles.

By the end of Day 1, participants should have:

  • A mission direction

  • A values shortlist

  • A clearer sense of purpose

  • Initial positioning principles

Day 2: Audience & Customer Understanding

Many businesses think they know their audience. A Brand Sprint often reveals that different stakeholders have completely different assumptions.

The original GV framework includes an exercise focused on identifying the audiences whose opinions matter most.

Participants generate audience options using sticky notes and then use a note-and-vote process to prioritize them.

The resulting discussion often highlights an important reality: not all audiences deserve equal attention.

Depending on the company, priority audiences may include:

  • Customers

  • Business buyers

  • Partners

  • Investors

  • Potential hires

  • Industry analysts

  • Reporters

  • Government regulators

The objective is not to create exhaustive buyer documentation. The objective is to identify the top three audiences that should influence positioning decisions.

This stage creates clarity around whose problems the company exists to solve. Participants collect answers individually before discussing them as a group. This reduces groupthink and ensures that members of the own team contribute independently. Teams are also encouraged to think beyond current customers and consider future dates, future markets, and how the own company may evolve over time.

Day 3: Competitive Positioning

Positioning only exists relative to alternatives.

This is why competitive landscape analysis is a central component of the Brand Sprint framework.

Most workshops use a 2x2 matrix to map competitors and identify whitespace opportunities.

The goal is not simply to list competitors. Teams examine:

  • Direct competitors

  • Indirect competitors

  • Alternative solutions

  • Status quo behaviors

Many companies discover that they are competing against assumptions, internal processes, or inertia rather than specific businesses.

The competitive landscape exercise helps participants identify unique advantages and define how the company should position itself within the market.

By the end of the day, teams should have a clearer understanding of what differentiates them and which positioning opportunities deserve focus.

Day 4: Messaging & Narrative

Once positioning is defined, messaging becomes significantly easier.

Many companies make the mistake of starting with messaging. The Brand Sprint framework reverses this process.

The discussion shifts toward:

  • Value proposition

  • Narrative structure

  • Brand story

  • Key messages

  • Brand personality

This stage often includes personality exercises such as Brand Extremes or Personality Sliders, where participants define where the company sits between opposing traits.

Examples include:

  • Serious vs playful

  • Traditional vs innovative

  • Expert vs accessible

  • Premium vs mass appeal

These exercises help transform abstract ideas into communication principles.

The result is a messaging foundation that reflects the company's identity rather than generic industry language.

Day 5: Validation & Alignment

The final day focuses on alignment and validation.

Participants review outputs from previous sessions and test them against real business scenarios.

Questions typically include:

  • Does this positioning support future growth?

  • Would employees understand it?

  • Does it differentiate us?

  • Does it support future product expansion?

  • Can it guide future brand identity decisions?

Many teams gather feedback from trusted customers, advisors, or internal stakeholders before finalizing outputs.

The final deliverable is often a simple brand cheat sheet that summarizes:

  • Mission

  • Values

  • Audience priorities

  • Positioning

  • Personality

  • Messaging principles

This document becomes a reference point for future decisions across marketing, product, hiring, and brand development.

Who Should Be in the Room for a Brand Sprint

Participant selection has an enormous impact on sprint outcomes.

The original framework recommends two to six participants.

Too few people limits perspective. Too many people slow decision making and create unnecessary complexity.

Most successful Brand Sprints include:

  • CEO or founder

  • Co-founder

  • Marketing lead

  • Product leader

  • Sales leader

  • Customer-facing representative

A critical role within the process is the Decider.

The Decider is responsible for making the final call when disagreements arise. Without a clearly designated decision maker, workshops can become endless debates.

Independent facilitators can also improve outcomes. External facilitators help maintain momentum, challenge assumptions, and keep discussions focused.

Company Stage

Recommended Participants

Decision Maker

Startup

Founder, co-founder, early marketing lead

Founder

Growth Stage

Leadership team, marketing, product, sales

CEO

Mature Company

Cross-functional leadership team

Executive sponsor

The goal is not broad representation. The goal is strategic alignment among the people responsible for future decisions.

Brand Sprint vs. Traditional Brand Strategy: What's the Difference

A Brand Sprint is not a replacement for a full brand strategy process.

The two approaches solve different problems.

Dimension

Brand Sprint

Traditional Brand Strategy

Timeline

Days

Weeks or months

Research Depth

Moderate

Extensive

Stakeholder Involvement

High

Moderate

Speed

Very fast

Slower

Cost

Lower

Higher

Deliverables

Positioning foundation

Comprehensive strategy

Best Use Cases

Alignment and clarity

Strategic transformation

A Brand Sprint prioritizes speed and alignment.

A traditional strategy process prioritizes research, market analysis, customer interviews, and deeper investigation.

For startups and early-stage companies, a Brand Sprint can be enough to establish positioning and create decision making principles.

For complex businesses, category creation efforts, or major rebranding projects, a full strategy process is often necessary.

Many companies use a Brand Sprint as the starting point for a broader engagement with a brand strategy agency.

Common Brand Sprint Mistakes (and How to Avoid Them)

The most common mistake is treating the workshop as a brainstorming session rather than a decision making process.

Another frequent problem is inviting too many people.

Larger groups create political discussions instead of strategic alignment. The workshop becomes harder to facilitate and slower to execute.

A second mistake is failing to include a Decider.

Without someone responsible for final decisions, disagreements remain unresolved.

Insufficient preparation also creates problems. Participants should arrive with a basic understanding of customers, competitors, and business goals.

Another common mistake is skipping customer evidence.

Opinions are useful, but positioning decisions should be informed by real market signals. Companies that incorporate customer feedback, sales insights, and market research tend to produce stronger outcomes.

Teams also frequently focus on messaging before positioning.

This creates polished language without strategic clarity.

The most effective Brand Sprint workshops establish positioning first and build messaging afterward.

Examples

Linear

Linear's positioning demonstrates the value of strategic clarity. Rather than attempting to appeal to every software team, the company built its brand around speed, focus, and craftsmanship. That positioning influences everything from messaging to product design.

Ramp

Ramp provides another useful example. Instead of leading with finance software features, the company positions itself around helping businesses spend less. This positioning creates a clear narrative that supports growth, customer acquisition, and differentiation.

FAQs

What is a brand sprint in marketing?

A Brand Sprint is a structured workshop that helps teams define brand positioning, values, audience priorities, personality, and strategic direction in a short period of time.

How long does a brand sprint take?

The original GV Brand Sprint takes approximately three hours. Expanded versions can run across several days, with a 5-day Brand Sprint being a common format.

Who created the brand sprint framework?

The framework was popularized by Google Ventures through the work of Jake Knapp and his team.

Can small businesses or startups run a brand sprint?

Yes. In fact, startups often benefit the most because Brand Sprints help founders align around positioning before investing heavily in branding, marketing, or product expansion.

What do you need to prepare before a brand sprint?

Participants should gather information about customers, competitors, market dynamics, business goals, and future growth plans before the workshop begins.

What's the difference between a brand sprint and a design sprint?

A Brand Sprint focuses on positioning, identity, values, and messaging. A Design Sprint focuses on solving product or user experience problems through prototyping and testing.

How do you measure the success of a brand sprint?

Success is measured by alignment, clarity, quality of positioning decisions, speed of future decision making, and the ability to create consistent messaging and brand identity afterward.

Do you need a branding agency to run a brand sprint?

No. Internal teams can run Brand Sprints themselves. However, experienced facilitators or branding agencies can often help reduce bias, improve participation, and accelerate decision making.

Masha Nikitina

Founder

Masha Nikitina

Founder

Contact

Ready to create gravity
in your market?

Contact

Ready to create gravity
in your market?

Contact

Ready to create gravity
in your market?

Continue Reading